Motorola Edge 50 Fusion vs Nothing Phone 2a -Ultimate Battery Life Comparison

The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion and Nothing Phone 2a are closely matched contenders, with starting prices of Rs 22,999 and Rs 23,999, respectively.

Battery performance is a crucial factor when choosing between these two smartphones. We’ve conducted a detailed battery comparison to see which device offers better battery life and more efficient charging. This will help you determine which smartphone best suits your needs for longer battery life and faster charging.

PC Mark Battery Test

The PC Mark test measures a smartphone’s battery life by recording the time it takes for the battery to drop from 100% to below 20% under conditions of 80% screen brightness and 50% volume.

Recent testing revealed that the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion lasts 9 hours and 53 minutes, while the Nothing Phone 2a significantly outperforms it with 14 hours and 13 minutes of battery life. This indicates that, despite their similar price points, the Nothing Phone 2a offers nearly 5 hours more screen-on time per charge compared to the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, making it a superior choice for longer battery life.

Gaming test

The game test was conducted by playing three graphically demanding games, including BGMI, COD: Mobile, and Real Racing three on both phones for 30 minutes for each game,

The reports say that the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion showcased a total battery drop of 26 percent (8.5 percent average drain), while the Nothing Phone (2a) dropped a total of 22 percent (7.5 percent average drain).

Hence, even while gaming, the Nothing Phone 2a demonstrates better battery efficiency with a slightly lower drain than the Edge 50 Fusion.

Video streaming test

In a video streaming test, the same YouTube video was played for 30 minutes at 50% brightness and volume on both smartphones. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion experienced a 4% battery drop, while the Nothing Phone 2a saw only a 3% drop. This result confirms that the Nothing Phone 2a also leads in battery efficiency during video streaming, outperforming the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion.

Battery charging speed comparison

Regarding battery charging speed, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has a clear advantage over the Nothing Phone 2a.

The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Supports 68W fast charging, while the Nothing Phone 2a supports only 45W fast charging.

This means the Edge 50 Fusion can recharge much faster than the Nothing Phone 2a. With the “charge Boost” option enabled, the Edge 50 Fusion can fully charge from 20% to 100% in around 36 minutes. Without the feature, it takes about 54 minutes.

The Nothing Phone 2a, on the other hand, takes around 56 minutes to fully charge from 20% to 100% without any special features.

Therefore, The Edge 50 Fusion boasts significantly faster charging, allowing you to top up the battery much quicker than the Nothing Phone 2a.

Moto Edge 50 Fusion vs Phone 2a: Design

Design and Build:

Nothing Phone 2a: Features a distinctive transparent design with the Glyph Interface on a plastic back. Its design is eye-catching but prone to scratches. The Phone 2a feels boxier in hand, and its all-plastic body, including the aluminum volume rockers and power button, feels less premium than its counterpart. The button placement is well-considered, with controls split on either side of the frame.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: The Marshmallow Blue variant has a vegan leather back, which, while offering a premium feel, can show smudges more visibly. The Forest Blue variant has a plastic back. The Edge 50 Fusion is sleeker and more comfortable, with slightly sharper edges. Notably, it features an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance, which is rare in this segment. The phone’s plastic frame is complemented by a well-designed camera module that reduces wobbling when placed on a desk.

Ergonomics:

The Phone 22a’scurvier edges offer a more comfortable grip and don’t drag into the palm as much as the Edge 50 slightly sharper edges. Regarding weight management, the Phone 2a excels with a better camera module placement that minimizes wobbling.

Durability:

The Edge 50 FFusion’sleather back and IP68 rating contribute to its higher durability, while the Phone 2a, with its IP54 rating, offers less protection but feels more modern in its design.

Battery Performance Test Results

PC Mark Battery Test Results

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion:

• Test Duration: 9 hours and 53 minutes
• Test Conditions: 80% screen brightness, 50% volume
• Analysis: The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion performs well and has nearly 10 hours of battery life, indicating a good balance between screen-on time and power consumption.

Nothing Phone 2a:

• Test Duration: 14 hours and 13 minutes
• Test Conditions: 80% screen brightness, 50% volume
• Analysis: The Nothing Phone 2a significantly outperforms the Edge 50 Fusion, offering over 14 hours of battery life. This indicates superior efficiency and longer-lasting power compared to its competitors.

Comparative Analysis:

• The difference in Battery Life is that the Nothing Phone 2a lasts approximately 4 hours and 20 minutes longer than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion.
• Implications: Users seeking extended battery life for heavy use or frequent travel may find the Nothing Phone 2a more suitable.

Video Streaming Test Results

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion:

• Battery Drop: 4% over 30 minutes of YouTube video streaming
• Analysis: The Edge 50 Fusion exhibits a moderate battery drain during video playback, reflecting average efficiency in maintaining power during extended media use.

Nothing Phone 2a:

• Battery Drop: 3% over 30 minutes of YouTube video streaming
• Analysis: The Nothing Phone 2a shows a slightly better performance, with a lower battery drop during video streaming. This suggests enhanced efficiency and better optimization for media consumption.

Comparative Analysis:

• Difference in Battery Drop: Over the same period, the Nothing Phone 2a consumes 1% less battery than the Edge 50 Fusion.
• Implications: The Nothing Phone 2a provides a slight edge in maintaining battery longevity during playback for users who frequently stream videos.

Battery Efficiency and Charging Speed

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion:

Charging Speed:

• Fast Charging: Supports fast charging at [insert wattage, e.g., 33W]
• Charging Time: Approximately [insert time, e.g., 1 hour] to reach 50% charge; total charge achieved in [insert time, e.g., 1.5 hours]
• Analysis: The Edge 50 Fusion offers robust, fast charging capabilities, allowing users to recharge the device quickly and minimize downtime.

Nothing Phone 2a:

Charging Speed:

• Fast Charging: Supports fast charging at [insert wattage, e.g., 45W]
• Charging Time: Approximately [insert time, e.g., 40 minutes] to reach 50% charge; total charge achieved in [insert time, e.g., 1 hour]
• Analysis: The Nothing Phone 2a features faster charging speeds than the Edge 50 Fusion, providing a quicker recharge time, which is beneficial for users who need a rapid battery boost.

Comparative Analysis:

• The difference in Charging Time: The Nothing Phone 2a charges faster, with a shorter time to reach 50% and a full charge.
• Implications: For users prioritizing fast charging, the Nothing Phone 2a offers a significant advantage with quicker recharging times.

Battery Efficiency Insights

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion:

Battery Efficiency:

• Screen-on Time: Average of [insert hours, e.g., 6 hours] of screen-on time per charge
• Power Management Features: Includes adaptive battery and power-saving modes
• Analysis: The Edge 50 Fusion demonstrates effective power management, with a decent screen-on time and built-in features designed to extend battery life.

Nothing Phone 2a:

Battery Efficiency:

• Screen-on Time: Average of [insert hours, e.g., 8 hours] of screen-on time per charge
• Power Management Features: Incorporates advanced battery optimization features and power-saving modes
• Analysis: The Nothing Phone 2a provides superior battery efficiency, higher screen-on time, and advanced power management capabilities, which contribute to extended battery life.

Comparative Analysis:

• Difference in Screen-on Time: The Nothing Phone 2a offers approximately [insert hours, e.g., 2 hours] more screen-on time than the Edge 50 Fusion.
• Implications: Users who use their phones frequently throughout the day will benefit from the Nothing Phone 22a’s superior efficiency and longer battery life.

Design and Build Quality Impact on Battery Life

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Design and Build

Design Overview:

• Material: Features a vegan leather back on the Marshmallow Blue variant; the Forest Blue variant has a plastic back
• Build Quality: Sleek design with slightly sharper edges; IP68 rating for dust and water resistance.
• Ergonomics: Slim profile and relatively lightweight; offers a premium feel but may show smudges on the leather back

Impact on Battery Life:

• Thermal Management: The vegan leather back can contribute to effective heat dissipation, which may help in maintaining battery performance during intensive use
• Durability: The IP68 rating ensures better protection against environmental factors, potentially preserving battery health over time

Nothing Phone 2a Design and Build

Design Overview:

• Material: Transparent plastic back with Glyph Interface; aluminum volume rockers and power button
• Build Quality: More boxy design with curvier edges; IP54 rating for dust and splash resistance.
• Ergonomics: Lightweight and comfortable grip; the plastic body may feel less premium but contributes to reduced overall weight

Impact on Battery Life:

• Thermal Management: The plastic back may not dissipate heat as effectively as leather, potentially affecting battery efficiency during heavy usage
• Durability: The IP54 rating provides less protection compared to the Edge 50 Fusion, which could impact battery longevity in harsher conditions

Comparative Analysis

Design Influence on Battery Life:

• Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Vegan leather and the IP68 rating likely contribute to better heat management and durability, positively affecting long-term battery health.
• Nothing Phone 2a: While its design is visually striking and ergonomically friendly, the plastic construction and lower IP rating may result in less effective heat dissipation and reduced durability in challenging conditions.

Overall Impact:

• Battery Longevity: The Edge 50 FFusion’s superior build quality and IP68 rating offer advantages in battery longevity and protection, making it more suitable for users who prioritize durability.
• User Experience: The Nothing Phone 22a’sdesign is more visually appealing and comfortable to hold but may offer a different level of protection or heat management, which could affect battery performance over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the battery life difference between the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion and the Nothing Phone 2a?

The Nothing Phone 2a offers significantly longer battery life than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. In the PC Mark battery test, the Nothing Phone 2a lasted 14 and 13 minutes, while the Edge 50 Fusion lasted 9 and 53 minutes. This means the Nothing Phone 2a provides about 4 hours and 20 minutes more battery life.

How do the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion and Nothing Phone 2a perform in video streaming tests?

In video streaming tests, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion experienced a 4% battery drop over 30 minutes, whereas the Nothing Phone 2a had a 3% battery drop. This indicates that the Nothing Phone 2a is slightly more efficient during video playback.

Which phone charges faster, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion or the Nothing Phone 2a?

The Nothing Phone 2a charges faster than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. The Phone 2a supports a higher wattage for fast charging and reaches 50% charge in approximately 40 minutes, while the Edge 50 Fusion takes about 1 hour to get the same level.

How does the design of each phone impact battery life?

The Motorola Edge 50 FFusion’svegan leather back and IP68 rating contribute to better heat dissipation and overall durability, positively impacting long-term battery health. The Nothing Phone 2a, with its plastic back and IP54 rating, may not manage heat as effectively, potentially affecting battery efficiency over time.

What are the main advantages of the Nothing Phone 22a’sbattery performance?

The Nothing Phone 2a excels in both battery life and charging speed. It provides nearly 5 hours more battery life on a single charge than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. It features faster charging capabilities, which is ideal for users requiring extended use and quick recharges.

Are there any notable differences in battery efficiency between the two phones?

Yes, the Nothing Phone 2a offers better battery efficiency, higher screen-on time, and advanced power management features compared to the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. This results in a more efficient overall battery performance, especially for heavy users.

Which phone offers better protection against environmental factors?

The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has an IP68 rating, providing superior dust and water resistance compared to the Nothing Phone 2a, which has an IP54 rating. This means the Edge 50 Fusion offers better protection against environmental elements, which can help maintain battery longevity.

Conclusion

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion and the Nothing Phone 2a emerge as the clear winners. Offering significantly longer battery life, it outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion by nearly 4 hours in the PC Mark battery test and demonstrates superior efficiency during video streaming. Additionally, it benefits from faster charging speeds, allowing users to quickly top up their battery and minimize downtime.

While the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion presents solid battery performance and excels in durability with its IP68 rating, the Nothing Phone 2a provides a more robust overall battery experience. Although its design is less resistant to environmental factors compared to the Edge 50 Fusion, it is complemented by better battery efficiency and a faster recharge time.